Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
AAR ruled that the applicant is not entitled to input tax credit (ITC) in three key scenarios: (1) IGST paid on importing sample drugs supplied free to hospitals/clinics, (2) IGST paid by logistics service provider under Delivered Duty Paid model, and (3) CGST paid for Customs House Agent and logistics services. The ruling hinged on Section 17(5)(h) of CGST Act, which prohibits ITC for goods disposed as free samples or gifts. The sample drugs were imported for clinical trials without commercial consideration, thus categorized as free samples, rendering ITC impermissible across all associated tax payments and services.
AAR ruled that the applicant is not entitled to input tax credit (ITC) in three key scenarios: (1) IGST paid on importing sample drugs supplied free to hospitals/clinics, (2) IGST paid by logistics service provider under Delivered Duty Paid model, and (3) CGST paid for Customs House Agent and logistics services. The ruling hinged on Section 17(5)(h) of CGST Act, which prohibits ITC for goods disposed as free samples or gifts. The sample drugs were imported for clinical trials without commercial consideration, thus categorized as free samples, rendering ITC impermissible across all associated tax payments and services.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
