Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT adjudicated a service classification dispute involving foreign university marketing services. The tribunal determined that the appellant's services constituted direct export of services, not intermediary services as alleged by tax authorities. The key finding established that services rendered by the appellant for promoting foreign universities were principal-to-principal transactions, with commissions received in foreign currency. Consequently, the services qualified as export of services, rendering them exempt from service tax. The tribunal consistently applied established legal precedents supporting the appellant's position, ultimately allowing the appeal and affirming the non-taxable status of the services provided to foreign universities outside India.
CESTAT adjudicated a service classification dispute involving foreign university marketing services. The tribunal determined that the appellant's services constituted direct export of services, not intermediary services as alleged by tax authorities. The key finding established that services rendered by the appellant for promoting foreign universities were principal-to-principal transactions, with commissions received in foreign currency. Consequently, the services qualified as export of services, rendering them exempt from service tax. The tribunal consistently applied established legal precedents supporting the appellant's position, ultimately allowing the appeal and affirming the non-taxable status of the services provided to foreign universities outside India.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.