Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
HC held that the tax assessment notices for 2016-17 and 2017-18 were invalid due to procedural non-compliance. The assessment under Section 40 of Assam VAT Act, 2003 was time-barred and lacked substantive legal basis, as the prescribed authority failed to establish 'reason to believe' and did not follow mandatory pre-assessment conditions. Consequently, the HC set aside the assessment orders and consequential demand notices, effectively rendering them legally unsustainable and providing relief to the petitioner.
HC held that the tax assessment notices for 2016-17 and 2017-18 were invalid due to procedural non-compliance. The assessment under Section 40 of Assam VAT Act, 2003 was time-barred and lacked substantive legal basis, as the prescribed authority failed to establish 'reason to believe' and did not follow mandatory pre-assessment conditions. Consequently, the HC set aside the assessment orders and consequential demand notices, effectively rendering them legally unsustainable and providing relief to the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.