Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT dismissed applications for condonation of delay in refiling Company Appeals involving 210 and 213 days delay. The Tribunal found no sufficient cause for the extensive delay, determining the Appellant's explanation as manufactured and lacking genuineness. Emphasizing the time-sensitive nature of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code proceedings, the Tribunal held that substantial justice cannot be achieved by granting unwarranted delay extensions. The applications were rejected, underscoring the critical importance of timely procedural compliance and the need for credible explanations when seeking delay condonation.
NCLAT dismissed applications for condonation of delay in refiling Company Appeals involving 210 and 213 days delay. The Tribunal found no sufficient cause for the extensive delay, determining the Appellant's explanation as manufactured and lacking genuineness. Emphasizing the time-sensitive nature of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code proceedings, the Tribunal held that substantial justice cannot be achieved by granting unwarranted delay extensions. The applications were rejected, underscoring the critical importance of timely procedural compliance and the need for credible explanations when seeking delay condonation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.