Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismissed applications for condonation of delay in refiling Company Appeals involving 210 and 213 days delay. The Tribunal found no sufficient cause for the extensive delay, determining the Appellant's explanation as manufactured and lacking genuineness. Emphasizing the time-sensitive nature of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code proceedings, the Tribunal held that substantial justice cannot be achieved by granting unwarranted delay extensions. The applications were rejected, underscoring the critical importance of timely procedural compliance and the need for credible explanations when seeking delay condonation.
NCLAT dismissed applications for condonation of delay in refiling Company Appeals involving 210 and 213 days delay. The Tribunal found no sufficient cause for the extensive delay, determining the Appellant's explanation as manufactured and lacking genuineness. Emphasizing the time-sensitive nature of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code proceedings, the Tribunal held that substantial justice cannot be achieved by granting unwarranted delay extensions. The applications were rejected, underscoring the critical importance of timely procedural compliance and the need for credible explanations when seeking delay condonation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.