Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT upheld penalty proceedings under section 271D against the assessee for accepting cash loans during FY 2016-17. Evidence from seized documents and statements of Sachin Nahar confirmed cash loans provided to Mantra Properties. The authorized representative failed to rebut the evidence during cross-examination. Despite CIT(A)'s earlier deletion of addition, ITAT ruled that concrete evidence existed through incriminating documents detailing cash loans, interest payments, and corroborative statements. The tribunal determined the penalty was justified, allowing the revenue's appeal and reinstating the penalty levied by JCIT/Addl.CIT under section 271D.
ITAT upheld penalty proceedings under section 271D against the assessee for accepting cash loans during FY 2016-17. Evidence from seized documents and statements of Sachin Nahar confirmed cash loans provided to Mantra Properties. The authorized representative failed to rebut the evidence during cross-examination. Despite CIT(A)'s earlier deletion of addition, ITAT ruled that concrete evidence existed through incriminating documents detailing cash loans, interest payments, and corroborative statements. The tribunal determined the penalty was justified, allowing the revenue's appeal and reinstating the penalty levied by JCIT/Addl.CIT under section 271D.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
