Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT determined that for transactions of share alienation during FY 2015-16, pre-amended India-Singapore DTAA provisions apply. The tribunal found insufficient evidence regarding Singapore tax treatment, leaving the second condition of Article 24(1) unresolved. Ultimately, the assessee was deemed eligible for Article 13(4) benefits, with taxing rights attributed to Singapore for capital gains on shares acquired before 01 April 2017. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow carry forward of short-term capital losses and apply treaty benefits for gross short-term capital gains, effectively allowing the additional ground of appeal.
ITAT determined that for transactions of share alienation during FY 2015-16, pre-amended India-Singapore DTAA provisions apply. The tribunal found insufficient evidence regarding Singapore tax treatment, leaving the second condition of Article 24(1) unresolved. Ultimately, the assessee was deemed eligible for Article 13(4) benefits, with taxing rights attributed to Singapore for capital gains on shares acquired before 01 April 2017. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow carry forward of short-term capital losses and apply treaty benefits for gross short-term capital gains, effectively allowing the additional ground of appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
