Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
HC invalidated Notification No. 56/2023-Central Tax, which extended limitation periods under Section 168A of CGST Act for financial years 2018-19 and 2019-20. The court found the notification legally unsustainable, effectively setting aside the time limitation extension and consequently nullifying the subsequent demand order of Rs. 1,20,01,973 raised against the petitioner. The ruling emphasizes judicial scrutiny of administrative tax notifications and their compliance with statutory provisions, ultimately protecting the registered assessee's procedural rights by quashing the impugned notification.
HC invalidated Notification No. 56/2023-Central Tax, which extended limitation periods under Section 168A of CGST Act for financial years 2018-19 and 2019-20. The court found the notification legally unsustainable, effectively setting aside the time limitation extension and consequently nullifying the subsequent demand order of Rs. 1,20,01,973 raised against the petitioner. The ruling emphasizes judicial scrutiny of administrative tax notifications and their compliance with statutory provisions, ultimately protecting the registered assessee's procedural rights by quashing the impugned notification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
