Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT remanded the case to the Addl./Joint CIT(A) to determine the validity of an adjustment under section 143(1)(a) without a prior show cause notice. The tribunal found potential procedural irregularities in the tax assessment, specifically questioning whether a mandatory notice was issued before making the adjustment. The appellate authority was directed to ascertain the factual circumstances, particularly examining whether the absence of a show cause notice renders the tax adjustment invalid. The assessee's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with instructions to comprehensively review the procedural compliance and potential exemption allowability based on the audit report filing.
ITAT remanded the case to the Addl./Joint CIT(A) to determine the validity of an adjustment under section 143(1)(a) without a prior show cause notice. The tribunal found potential procedural irregularities in the tax assessment, specifically questioning whether a mandatory notice was issued before making the adjustment. The appellate authority was directed to ascertain the factual circumstances, particularly examining whether the absence of a show cause notice renders the tax adjustment invalid. The assessee's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with instructions to comprehensively review the procedural compliance and potential exemption allowability based on the audit report filing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.