Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AT addressed the interplay between PMLA and IBC provisions regarding attached properties of a corporate debtor. The tribunal held that Section 32-A(2) prohibits actions against corporate debtor properties for offenses predating the corporate insolvency resolution process. The resolution plan for the corporate debtor was approved by the Committee of Creditors, permitting property disposal as per resolution plan terms. If the resolution plan fails, the appellant bank can seek auction sale through the PMLA Court, with an undertaking to deposit excess proceeds. The tribunal emphasized that no punitive action shall be taken against corporate debtor properties covered under an approved resolution plan, effectively balancing investigative interests with insolvency resolution mechanisms. Appeal disposed of.
The AT addressed the interplay between PMLA and IBC provisions regarding attached properties of a corporate debtor. The tribunal held that Section 32-A(2) prohibits actions against corporate debtor properties for offenses predating the corporate insolvency resolution process. The resolution plan for the corporate debtor was approved by the Committee of Creditors, permitting property disposal as per resolution plan terms. If the resolution plan fails, the appellant bank can seek auction sale through the PMLA Court, with an undertaking to deposit excess proceeds. The tribunal emphasized that no punitive action shall be taken against corporate debtor properties covered under an approved resolution plan, effectively balancing investigative interests with insolvency resolution mechanisms. Appeal disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
