Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT analyzed cash deposit during demonetization, finding no unexplained income. Assessee declared total sales of Rs. 49,03,470/- including cash sales of Rs. 30,25,930/-, with VAT returns matching ITR declarations. Independent VAT authorities confirmed no errors. Cash deposited originated from legitimate sales proceeds existing prior to demonetization announcement. Following precedent in similar cases, ITAT deleted addition under Section 69A, rejecting tax authorities' conjecture of undisclosed income. Tribunal ruled in favor of assessee, holding that taxing same income twice would be improper and unsupported by evidence.
ITAT analyzed cash deposit during demonetization, finding no unexplained income. Assessee declared total sales of Rs. 49,03,470/- including cash sales of Rs. 30,25,930/-, with VAT returns matching ITR declarations. Independent VAT authorities confirmed no errors. Cash deposited originated from legitimate sales proceeds existing prior to demonetization announcement. Following precedent in similar cases, ITAT deleted addition under Section 69A, rejecting tax authorities' conjecture of undisclosed income. Tribunal ruled in favor of assessee, holding that taxing same income twice would be improper and unsupported by evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
