Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
The AT dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with pre-deposit conditions under section 52. The appellant failed to deposit the required Rs. 25 lakhs within the stipulated 30-day period, despite being given multiple opportunities. The tribunal explicitly noted that without satisfying the pre-deposit condition, the appeal cannot be heard on merits. The appeal stood automatically dismissed due to the appellant's default, and no subsequent restoration application could remedy the procedural non-compliance. The tribunal maintained its strict interpretation of the statutory requirement, rendering the appeal non-maintainable.
The AT dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with pre-deposit conditions under section 52. The appellant failed to deposit the required Rs. 25 lakhs within the stipulated 30-day period, despite being given multiple opportunities. The tribunal explicitly noted that without satisfying the pre-deposit condition, the appeal cannot be heard on merits. The appeal stood automatically dismissed due to the appellant's default, and no subsequent restoration application could remedy the procedural non-compliance. The tribunal maintained its strict interpretation of the statutory requirement, rendering the appeal non-maintainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4921 
