Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
HC held that the Adjudicating Authority must reconsider the GST assessment by applying Circular No. 199/11/2023-GST and recent precedent. The court found the original order did not properly consider the circular's provisions regarding cross-charged expenses. The Adjudicating Authority is directed to provide a fresh hearing to the petitioner and issue a new order consistent with the circular's guidelines, potentially nullifying the tax liability. The court referenced the Metal One Corporation judgment, which suggested no tax liability where no invoices were generated. Petition disposed of with directions for re-evaluation.
HC held that the Adjudicating Authority must reconsider the GST assessment by applying Circular No. 199/11/2023-GST and recent precedent. The court found the original order did not properly consider the circular's provisions regarding cross-charged expenses. The Adjudicating Authority is directed to provide a fresh hearing to the petitioner and issue a new order consistent with the circular's guidelines, potentially nullifying the tax liability. The court referenced the Metal One Corporation judgment, which suggested no tax liability where no invoices were generated. Petition disposed of with directions for re-evaluation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
