Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC held that the Adjudicating Authority must reconsider the GST assessment by applying Circular No. 199/11/2023-GST and recent precedent. The court found the original order did not properly consider the circular's provisions regarding cross-charged expenses. The Adjudicating Authority is directed to provide a fresh hearing to the petitioner and issue a new order consistent with the circular's guidelines, potentially nullifying the tax liability. The court referenced the Metal One Corporation judgment, which suggested no tax liability where no invoices were generated. Petition disposed of with directions for re-evaluation.
HC held that the Adjudicating Authority must reconsider the GST assessment by applying Circular No. 199/11/2023-GST and recent precedent. The court found the original order did not properly consider the circular's provisions regarding cross-charged expenses. The Adjudicating Authority is directed to provide a fresh hearing to the petitioner and issue a new order consistent with the circular's guidelines, potentially nullifying the tax liability. The court referenced the Metal One Corporation judgment, which suggested no tax liability where no invoices were generated. Petition disposed of with directions for re-evaluation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
