Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that the Adjudicating Authority must reconsider the GST assessment by applying Circular No. 199/11/2023-GST and recent precedent. The court found the original order did not properly consider the circular's provisions regarding cross-charged expenses. The Adjudicating Authority is directed to provide a fresh hearing to the petitioner and issue a new order consistent with the circular's guidelines, potentially nullifying the tax liability. The court referenced the Metal One Corporation judgment, which suggested no tax liability where no invoices were generated. Petition disposed of with directions for re-evaluation.
HC held that the Adjudicating Authority must reconsider the GST assessment by applying Circular No. 199/11/2023-GST and recent precedent. The court found the original order did not properly consider the circular's provisions regarding cross-charged expenses. The Adjudicating Authority is directed to provide a fresh hearing to the petitioner and issue a new order consistent with the circular's guidelines, potentially nullifying the tax liability. The court referenced the Metal One Corporation judgment, which suggested no tax liability where no invoices were generated. Petition disposed of with directions for re-evaluation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
