Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
HC allowed the petitioner's refund claim under GST regime, holding the department liable to refund the amount deposited in Electronic Cash Ledger. The court mandated interest calculation from 11th June 2018, recognizing procedural delays by the tax authorities. The department's failure to adhere to prescribed timelines under CGST Rules, specifically Rule 89 and Rule 90, resulted in the petitioner's entitlement to refund with applicable interest. The petition was disposed of with directions for immediate refund and interest computation.
HC allowed the petitioner's refund claim under GST regime, holding the department liable to refund the amount deposited in Electronic Cash Ledger. The court mandated interest calculation from 11th June 2018, recognizing procedural delays by the tax authorities. The department's failure to adhere to prescribed timelines under CGST Rules, specifically Rule 89 and Rule 90, resulted in the petitioner's entitlement to refund with applicable interest. The petition was disposed of with directions for immediate refund and interest computation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
