Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
HC allowed the petitioner's refund claim under GST regime, holding the department liable to refund the amount deposited in Electronic Cash Ledger. The court mandated interest calculation from 11th June 2018, recognizing procedural delays by the tax authorities. The department's failure to adhere to prescribed timelines under CGST Rules, specifically Rule 89 and Rule 90, resulted in the petitioner's entitlement to refund with applicable interest. The petition was disposed of with directions for immediate refund and interest computation.
HC allowed the petitioner's refund claim under GST regime, holding the department liable to refund the amount deposited in Electronic Cash Ledger. The court mandated interest calculation from 11th June 2018, recognizing procedural delays by the tax authorities. The department's failure to adhere to prescribed timelines under CGST Rules, specifically Rule 89 and Rule 90, resulted in the petitioner's entitlement to refund with applicable interest. The petition was disposed of with directions for immediate refund and interest computation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
