Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT held that additions to income were unsupported by corroborative evidence. The DR failed to substantiate claims based solely on seized diaries without independent verification. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete additions related to unreceipted fees, alleged agent payments, and fee income. The decision hinged on lack of substantive proof beyond unverified handwritten records, emphasizing the need for concrete documentary evidence in tax assessment proceedings. The tribunal's ruling effectively nullified the proposed income additions due to insufficient evidentiary support.
ITAT held that additions to income were unsupported by corroborative evidence. The DR failed to substantiate claims based solely on seized diaries without independent verification. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete additions related to unreceipted fees, alleged agent payments, and fee income. The decision hinged on lack of substantive proof beyond unverified handwritten records, emphasizing the need for concrete documentary evidence in tax assessment proceedings. The tribunal's ruling effectively nullified the proposed income additions due to insufficient evidentiary support.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.