Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT allowed the appeal, vacating the status quo order regarding the liquidator's removal. The Tribunal held that under IBC and VL Regulations, the Corporate Debtor has statutory authority to replace the liquidator without requiring Adjudicating Authority's approval. The tribunal found the original order interfered improperly with the corporate debtor's rights, determined the appeal was timely filed within limitation period, and emphasized the liquidator's replacement followed prescribed regulatory procedures. The outgoing liquidator must cooperate in document handover to the new liquidator, affirming the corporate debtor's discretionary power in liquidator selection.
NCLAT allowed the appeal, vacating the status quo order regarding the liquidator's removal. The Tribunal held that under IBC and VL Regulations, the Corporate Debtor has statutory authority to replace the liquidator without requiring Adjudicating Authority's approval. The tribunal found the original order interfered improperly with the corporate debtor's rights, determined the appeal was timely filed within limitation period, and emphasized the liquidator's replacement followed prescribed regulatory procedures. The outgoing liquidator must cooperate in document handover to the new liquidator, affirming the corporate debtor's discretionary power in liquidator selection.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.