Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT found material irregularities in the CIRP process involving the Resolution Professional. The Tribunal identified multiple violations including unauthorized MoU signing with a related party, misleading the Committee of Creditors, and procedural non-compliance with Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code regulations. While acknowledging the Supreme Court's precedent on CoC's commercial wisdom, the Tribunal emphasized that procedural safeguards cannot be circumvented. The appeal highlighted significant misconduct by the Resolution Professional, who was previously debarred by IBBI for professional irregularities. The Tribunal disposed of the appeal, effectively casting doubt on the resolution plan's integrity and the Resolution Professional's conduct during the corporate insolvency resolution process.
NCLAT found material irregularities in the CIRP process involving the Resolution Professional. The Tribunal identified multiple violations including unauthorized MoU signing with a related party, misleading the Committee of Creditors, and procedural non-compliance with Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code regulations. While acknowledging the Supreme Court's precedent on CoC's commercial wisdom, the Tribunal emphasized that procedural safeguards cannot be circumvented. The appeal highlighted significant misconduct by the Resolution Professional, who was previously debarred by IBBI for professional irregularities. The Tribunal disposed of the appeal, effectively casting doubt on the resolution plan's integrity and the Resolution Professional's conduct during the corporate insolvency resolution process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
