Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
AT upheld property attachment under Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, finding that inherited or acquired property predating the scheduled offence can be attached as equivalent value of proceeds of crime. Despite a delay of over ten years since the initial FIR, the tribunal rejected appellant's challenge, relying on SC's interpretation in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case. The attachment was validated under the second limb of "proceeds of crime" definition, even when original criminal proceeds were unavailable. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming ED's authority to attach property of equivalent value linked to alleged money laundering activities.
AT upheld property attachment under Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, finding that inherited or acquired property predating the scheduled offence can be attached as equivalent value of proceeds of crime. Despite a delay of over ten years since the initial FIR, the tribunal rejected appellant's challenge, relying on SC's interpretation in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case. The attachment was validated under the second limb of "proceeds of crime" definition, even when original criminal proceeds were unavailable. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming ED's authority to attach property of equivalent value linked to alleged money laundering activities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.