Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT partially allowed the appeals concerning EPCG Authorization and customs duty. The tribunal upheld the demand of customs duty with interest for non-fulfillment of exemption notification requirements. However, the tribunal set aside penalties under sections 114A and 112(a)(ii) of the Customs Act, and quashed confiscation orders under sections 111(j) and 111(o). The duty demand of Rs. 18,69,140/- with interest was also set aside, finding no intentional suppression of material facts to evade duty payment. The extended period of limitation was deemed inappropriate, and the commissioner's order was modified accordingly.
CESTAT partially allowed the appeals concerning EPCG Authorization and customs duty. The tribunal upheld the demand of customs duty with interest for non-fulfillment of exemption notification requirements. However, the tribunal set aside penalties under sections 114A and 112(a)(ii) of the Customs Act, and quashed confiscation orders under sections 111(j) and 111(o). The duty demand of Rs. 18,69,140/- with interest was also set aside, finding no intentional suppression of material facts to evade duty payment. The extended period of limitation was deemed inappropriate, and the commissioner's order was modified accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.