Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT remanded the case regarding seized cash from a bank locker, finding the Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) did not adequately examine the assessee's claim of income from speculative food grains business. The tribunal directed the AO to re-examine the matter afresh, providing the assessee reasonable opportunity to substantiate the source of seized cash. Additionally, the tribunal held that the CIT(A)'s interpretation of section 132B(1) was incorrect and directed the AO to allow credit of seized cash towards the assessee's self-assessment tax liability for Assessment Year 2019-20, after re-framing the assessment as per the tribunal's observations.
ITAT remanded the case regarding seized cash from a bank locker, finding the Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) did not adequately examine the assessee's claim of income from speculative food grains business. The tribunal directed the AO to re-examine the matter afresh, providing the assessee reasonable opportunity to substantiate the source of seized cash. Additionally, the tribunal held that the CIT(A)'s interpretation of section 132B(1) was incorrect and directed the AO to allow credit of seized cash towards the assessee's self-assessment tax liability for Assessment Year 2019-20, after re-framing the assessment as per the tribunal's observations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
