Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT remanded the case regarding seized cash from a bank locker, finding the Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) did not adequately examine the assessee's claim of income from speculative food grains business. The tribunal directed the AO to re-examine the matter afresh, providing the assessee reasonable opportunity to substantiate the source of seized cash. Additionally, the tribunal held that the CIT(A)'s interpretation of section 132B(1) was incorrect and directed the AO to allow credit of seized cash towards the assessee's self-assessment tax liability for Assessment Year 2019-20, after re-framing the assessment as per the tribunal's observations.
ITAT remanded the case regarding seized cash from a bank locker, finding the Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) did not adequately examine the assessee's claim of income from speculative food grains business. The tribunal directed the AO to re-examine the matter afresh, providing the assessee reasonable opportunity to substantiate the source of seized cash. Additionally, the tribunal held that the CIT(A)'s interpretation of section 132B(1) was incorrect and directed the AO to allow credit of seized cash towards the assessee's self-assessment tax liability for Assessment Year 2019-20, after re-framing the assessment as per the tribunal's observations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
