Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT appellate tribunal adjudicated classification dispute involving imported hydrocarbon oil. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the customs department's test report inadequate due to incomplete testing of prescribed parameters under BIS IS 1459:1974 standards. Only five out of eight mandatory parameters were examined, rendering the classification determination inconclusive. Consequently, the burden of proof remained unmet by the revenue authorities. The tribunal applied the principle of benefit of doubt in favor of the appellant, rejecting department's classification assessment and upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) order. Appeals were dismissed, effectively allowing the appellant's classification claim.
CESTAT appellate tribunal adjudicated classification dispute involving imported hydrocarbon oil. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the customs department's test report inadequate due to incomplete testing of prescribed parameters under BIS IS 1459:1974 standards. Only five out of eight mandatory parameters were examined, rendering the classification determination inconclusive. Consequently, the burden of proof remained unmet by the revenue authorities. The tribunal applied the principle of benefit of doubt in favor of the appellant, rejecting department's classification assessment and upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) order. Appeals were dismissed, effectively allowing the appellant's classification claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.