Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT ruled that warehousing charges collected by the Custom House Agent (CHA) as reimbursed expenses do not constitute taxable service value. Referencing the Supreme Court's precedent in Intercontinental Consultants, the tribunal affirmed that reimbursable expenses incurred in service provision should not be included in the assessable value. The decision invalidates the tax demand for warehousing charges for 2006-07, finding that Rule 5(1) of Service Tax Valuation Rules, 2006 exceeded statutory powers under Sections 66 and 67. Consequently, the appellant's appeal was allowed, setting aside the original tax assessment order.
CESTAT ruled that warehousing charges collected by the Custom House Agent (CHA) as reimbursed expenses do not constitute taxable service value. Referencing the Supreme Court's precedent in Intercontinental Consultants, the tribunal affirmed that reimbursable expenses incurred in service provision should not be included in the assessable value. The decision invalidates the tax demand for warehousing charges for 2006-07, finding that Rule 5(1) of Service Tax Valuation Rules, 2006 exceeded statutory powers under Sections 66 and 67. Consequently, the appellant's appeal was allowed, setting aside the original tax assessment order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.