Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging penalty for fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) availment under CGST Act, Section 122(1)(vii). The court held that writ jurisdiction should not be ordinarily exercised in cases involving ITC fraud, citing precedent. The petitioner was directed to pursue appellate remedies under Section 107 of CGST Act and permitted to file appeal by 15th July, 2025 with pre-deposit. The court emphasized that the appeal would be adjudicated on merits and not dismissed on limitation grounds, thereby preserving the petitioner's substantive rights while maintaining procedural integrity.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging penalty for fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) availment under CGST Act, Section 122(1)(vii). The court held that writ jurisdiction should not be ordinarily exercised in cases involving ITC fraud, citing precedent. The petitioner was directed to pursue appellate remedies under Section 107 of CGST Act and permitted to file appeal by 15th July, 2025 with pre-deposit. The court emphasized that the appeal would be adjudicated on merits and not dismissed on limitation grounds, thereby preserving the petitioner's substantive rights while maintaining procedural integrity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
