Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC upheld the validity of Rule 36(4) in CGST and TNGST Rules, which restricts Input Tax Credit (ITC) availment when suppliers fail to upload invoices under Section 37(1). The court determined that the rule was a temporary regulatory measure to protect government interests and taxpayers from potential recovery proceedings. The restrictions were deemed constitutionally valid and not violative of Article 14, with the amendment designed to ensure partial ITC availability while maintaining compliance mechanisms. The court emphasized that the rule's implementation was a proportionate response to systemic challenges in tax credit documentation, effectively rejecting the constitutional challenge to the regulatory provision.
HC upheld the validity of Rule 36(4) in CGST and TNGST Rules, which restricts Input Tax Credit (ITC) availment when suppliers fail to upload invoices under Section 37(1). The court determined that the rule was a temporary regulatory measure to protect government interests and taxpayers from potential recovery proceedings. The restrictions were deemed constitutionally valid and not violative of Article 14, with the amendment designed to ensure partial ITC availability while maintaining compliance mechanisms. The court emphasized that the rule's implementation was a proportionate response to systemic challenges in tax credit documentation, effectively rejecting the constitutional challenge to the regulatory provision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
