Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT adjudicated a tax penalty case involving outward remittances to Chinese companies. The tribunal found that the assessee was under a bona fide belief regarding Form 15CA submission, as the relevant rules prescribing the form were not notified until 01.04.2016, despite section 195(6) amendment on 01.06.2015. The lower authorities' imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deemed unjustified, given the lack of clear regulatory guidance during the relevant period. The tribunal consequently ruled in favor of the assessee, effectively quashing the penalty proceedings.
ITAT adjudicated a tax penalty case involving outward remittances to Chinese companies. The tribunal found that the assessee was under a bona fide belief regarding Form 15CA submission, as the relevant rules prescribing the form were not notified until 01.04.2016, despite section 195(6) amendment on 01.06.2015. The lower authorities' imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deemed unjustified, given the lack of clear regulatory guidance during the relevant period. The tribunal consequently ruled in favor of the assessee, effectively quashing the penalty proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
