Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT adjudicated a case involving procedural invalidity of assessment reopening. The tribunal held that sanction obtained from an incorrect Specified Authority renders the entire reassessment proceedings legally unsustainable. The court emphasized that obtaining approval from the appropriate hierarchical authority (Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director General) is a mandatory precondition for invoking reassessment jurisdiction under section 148. Where sanction is procured from an unauthorized official, the reopening of assessment stands quashed. The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, invalidating the reassessment notice due to procedural non-compliance with statutory requirements regarding sanctioning authority.
ITAT adjudicated a case involving procedural invalidity of assessment reopening. The tribunal held that sanction obtained from an incorrect Specified Authority renders the entire reassessment proceedings legally unsustainable. The court emphasized that obtaining approval from the appropriate hierarchical authority (Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director General) is a mandatory precondition for invoking reassessment jurisdiction under section 148. Where sanction is procured from an unauthorized official, the reopening of assessment stands quashed. The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, invalidating the reassessment notice due to procedural non-compliance with statutory requirements regarding sanctioning authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
