Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the reopening of assessments under Section 148 was valid. The CIT had applied his mind during approval under Section 151, being fully aware of case facts from prior proceedings under Section 264. The earlier assessments under Section 153C were annulled, rendering previous findings irrelevant. Consequential reassessment proceedings were not time-barred but addressed void proceedings. The administrative revision differed from appellate review, and the approval was not mechanical. The tribunal distinguished prior case laws and affirmed the legitimacy of initiating remedial assessment proceedings consistent with legal principles.
ITAT held that the reopening of assessments under Section 148 was valid. The CIT had applied his mind during approval under Section 151, being fully aware of case facts from prior proceedings under Section 264. The earlier assessments under Section 153C were annulled, rendering previous findings irrelevant. Consequential reassessment proceedings were not time-barred but addressed void proceedings. The administrative revision differed from appellate review, and the approval was not mechanical. The tribunal distinguished prior case laws and affirmed the legitimacy of initiating remedial assessment proceedings consistent with legal principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.