Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that the reopening of assessments under Section 148 was valid. The CIT had applied his mind during approval under Section 151, being fully aware of case facts from prior proceedings under Section 264. The earlier assessments under Section 153C were annulled, rendering previous findings irrelevant. Consequential reassessment proceedings were not time-barred but addressed void proceedings. The administrative revision differed from appellate review, and the approval was not mechanical. The tribunal distinguished prior case laws and affirmed the legitimacy of initiating remedial assessment proceedings consistent with legal principles.
ITAT held that the reopening of assessments under Section 148 was valid. The CIT had applied his mind during approval under Section 151, being fully aware of case facts from prior proceedings under Section 264. The earlier assessments under Section 153C were annulled, rendering previous findings irrelevant. Consequential reassessment proceedings were not time-barred but addressed void proceedings. The administrative revision differed from appellate review, and the approval was not mechanical. The tribunal distinguished prior case laws and affirmed the legitimacy of initiating remedial assessment proceedings consistent with legal principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.