Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
HC allowed the petition challenging a rectification order, finding procedural violations of natural justice. The court held that when a rectification application is rejected, the authority must provide reasoned order and opportunity of hearing to the applicant. The impugned order dated 28.03.2025 was set aside, directing the respondent to reconsider the rectification application afresh, provide notice to the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with legal principles, particularly Section 161's third proviso mandating hearing when an order adversely affects an assessee.
HC allowed the petition challenging a rectification order, finding procedural violations of natural justice. The court held that when a rectification application is rejected, the authority must provide reasoned order and opportunity of hearing to the applicant. The impugned order dated 28.03.2025 was set aside, directing the respondent to reconsider the rectification application afresh, provide notice to the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with legal principles, particularly Section 161's third proviso mandating hearing when an order adversely affects an assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
