Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that Special Additional Duty (SAD) is not leviable on raw jute imports when no Value Added Tax (VAT) is payable domestically. The tribunal determined that SAD is designed to counter-balance domestic sales taxes, and since raw jute was exempt from VAT under West Bengal VAT Act, no additional customs duty could be imposed. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the original demand for SAD, interest, and penalties, finding the appellant not liable for the contested customs duty.
CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that Special Additional Duty (SAD) is not leviable on raw jute imports when no Value Added Tax (VAT) is payable domestically. The tribunal determined that SAD is designed to counter-balance domestic sales taxes, and since raw jute was exempt from VAT under West Bengal VAT Act, no additional customs duty could be imposed. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the original demand for SAD, interest, and penalties, finding the appellant not liable for the contested customs duty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.