Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT held that the Section 7 application by home-buyers against the Corporate Debtor was maintainable and not barred by limitation. The Tribunal found sufficient evidence of debt and default, with funds received from home-buyers exceeding Rs. 1 Cr. The allegations of collusive litigation were rejected, emphasizing that inter-shareholder disputes cannot prejudice home-buyers' rights. The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals, upholding the Adjudicating Authority's order admitting the Section 7 application, recognizing home-buyers as legitimate financial creditors who have been awaiting project completion for over a decade.
NCLAT held that the Section 7 application by home-buyers against the Corporate Debtor was maintainable and not barred by limitation. The Tribunal found sufficient evidence of debt and default, with funds received from home-buyers exceeding Rs. 1 Cr. The allegations of collusive litigation were rejected, emphasizing that inter-shareholder disputes cannot prejudice home-buyers' rights. The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals, upholding the Adjudicating Authority's order admitting the Section 7 application, recognizing home-buyers as legitimate financial creditors who have been awaiting project completion for over a decade.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.