Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
NCLAT held that the Section 7 application by home-buyers against the Corporate Debtor was maintainable and not barred by limitation. The Tribunal found sufficient evidence of debt and default, with funds received from home-buyers exceeding Rs. 1 Cr. The allegations of collusive litigation were rejected, emphasizing that inter-shareholder disputes cannot prejudice home-buyers' rights. The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals, upholding the Adjudicating Authority's order admitting the Section 7 application, recognizing home-buyers as legitimate financial creditors who have been awaiting project completion for over a decade.
NCLAT held that the Section 7 application by home-buyers against the Corporate Debtor was maintainable and not barred by limitation. The Tribunal found sufficient evidence of debt and default, with funds received from home-buyers exceeding Rs. 1 Cr. The allegations of collusive litigation were rejected, emphasizing that inter-shareholder disputes cannot prejudice home-buyers' rights. The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals, upholding the Adjudicating Authority's order admitting the Section 7 application, recognizing home-buyers as legitimate financial creditors who have been awaiting project completion for over a decade.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.