Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
SC held that Section 11 of SARFAESI Act mandates statutory arbitration for disputes between banks, financial institutions, or asset reconstruction companies relating to securitization, reconstruction, or non-payment of dues. The provision creates a legal fiction presuming an arbitration agreement exists without requiring explicit written consent. The court affirmed that the dispute resolution mechanism under Section 11 is mandatory and cannot be circumvented by alternative guidelines. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, directing the parties to resolve their dispute through arbitration as prescribed under the SARFAESI Act.
SC held that Section 11 of SARFAESI Act mandates statutory arbitration for disputes between banks, financial institutions, or asset reconstruction companies relating to securitization, reconstruction, or non-payment of dues. The provision creates a legal fiction presuming an arbitration agreement exists without requiring explicit written consent. The court affirmed that the dispute resolution mechanism under Section 11 is mandatory and cannot be circumvented by alternative guidelines. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, directing the parties to resolve their dispute through arbitration as prescribed under the SARFAESI Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.