Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
HC ruled that the block period of six years for reassessment under Section 153C(1)(b) is to be calculated from 28.07.2022. The extended ten-year period is inapplicable in this case. The jurisdictional notice for Assessment Year 2016-17, falling beyond the six-year block period, was deemed unsustainable. Relying on prior judicial precedent, the court set aside the impugned notice, effectively invalidating the tax department's attempt to reopen the assessment beyond the prescribed statutory timeframe.
HC ruled that the block period of six years for reassessment under Section 153C(1)(b) is to be calculated from 28.07.2022. The extended ten-year period is inapplicable in this case. The jurisdictional notice for Assessment Year 2016-17, falling beyond the six-year block period, was deemed unsustainable. Relying on prior judicial precedent, the court set aside the impugned notice, effectively invalidating the tax department's attempt to reopen the assessment beyond the prescribed statutory timeframe.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
