Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
HC ruled that the block period of six years for reassessment under Section 153C(1)(b) is to be calculated from 28.07.2022. The extended ten-year period is inapplicable in this case. The jurisdictional notice for Assessment Year 2016-17, falling beyond the six-year block period, was deemed unsustainable. Relying on prior judicial precedent, the court set aside the impugned notice, effectively invalidating the tax department's attempt to reopen the assessment beyond the prescribed statutory timeframe.
HC ruled that the block period of six years for reassessment under Section 153C(1)(b) is to be calculated from 28.07.2022. The extended ten-year period is inapplicable in this case. The jurisdictional notice for Assessment Year 2016-17, falling beyond the six-year block period, was deemed unsustainable. Relying on prior judicial precedent, the court set aside the impugned notice, effectively invalidating the tax department's attempt to reopen the assessment beyond the prescribed statutory timeframe.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
