Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
HC held that the service of notices via email address listed on MCA website was valid and compliant with procedural rules. The petitioner received and responded to the scrutiny notice, thereby acknowledging awareness of assessment proceedings. Section 292BB was applicable as the petitioner participated in the inquiry and cannot subsequently challenge notice service. The court found no violation of natural justice principles, rejecting the petitioner's contention of improper notice service. The assessment order was upheld, with the court emphasizing that the petitioner's partial response and subsequent non-compliance undermined its procedural objections.
HC held that the service of notices via email address listed on MCA website was valid and compliant with procedural rules. The petitioner received and responded to the scrutiny notice, thereby acknowledging awareness of assessment proceedings. Section 292BB was applicable as the petitioner participated in the inquiry and cannot subsequently challenge notice service. The court found no violation of natural justice principles, rejecting the petitioner's contention of improper notice service. The assessment order was upheld, with the court emphasizing that the petitioner's partial response and subsequent non-compliance undermined its procedural objections.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.