Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
HC held that the service of notices via email address listed on MCA website was valid and compliant with procedural rules. The petitioner received and responded to the scrutiny notice, thereby acknowledging awareness of assessment proceedings. Section 292BB was applicable as the petitioner participated in the inquiry and cannot subsequently challenge notice service. The court found no violation of natural justice principles, rejecting the petitioner's contention of improper notice service. The assessment order was upheld, with the court emphasizing that the petitioner's partial response and subsequent non-compliance undermined its procedural objections.
HC held that the service of notices via email address listed on MCA website was valid and compliant with procedural rules. The petitioner received and responded to the scrutiny notice, thereby acknowledging awareness of assessment proceedings. Section 292BB was applicable as the petitioner participated in the inquiry and cannot subsequently challenge notice service. The court found no violation of natural justice principles, rejecting the petitioner's contention of improper notice service. The assessment order was upheld, with the court emphasizing that the petitioner's partial response and subsequent non-compliance undermined its procedural objections.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
