Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
HC held that the specified authority for approval under Section 151 depends on whether the reassessment notice under Section 148 was issued within three years from the end of the relevant assessment year. The court consistently interpreted that the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act (TOLA) extension does not impact the determination of the mandatory approval authority. Based on this legal principle, the court set aside the impugned notice, thereby allowing the assessee's appeal and invalidating the reassessment proceedings due to procedural non-compliance with Section 151 approval requirements.
HC held that the specified authority for approval under Section 151 depends on whether the reassessment notice under Section 148 was issued within three years from the end of the relevant assessment year. The court consistently interpreted that the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act (TOLA) extension does not impact the determination of the mandatory approval authority. Based on this legal principle, the court set aside the impugned notice, thereby allowing the assessee's appeal and invalidating the reassessment proceedings due to procedural non-compliance with Section 151 approval requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
