Unregistered profit-sharing agreements cannot justify occupation of corporate debtor premises during CIRP; repossession by the Resolution Professional...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2881 to 2900 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that the specified authority for approval under Section 151 depends on whether the reassessment notice under Section 148 was issued within three years from the end of the relevant assessment year. The court consistently interpreted that the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act (TOLA) extension does not impact the determination of the mandatory approval authority. Based on this legal principle, the court set aside the impugned notice, thereby allowing the assessee's appeal and invalidating the reassessment proceedings due to procedural non-compliance with Section 151 approval requirements.
HC held that the specified authority for approval under Section 151 depends on whether the reassessment notice under Section 148 was issued within three years from the end of the relevant assessment year. The court consistently interpreted that the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act (TOLA) extension does not impact the determination of the mandatory approval authority. Based on this legal principle, the court set aside the impugned notice, thereby allowing the assessee's appeal and invalidating the reassessment proceedings due to procedural non-compliance with Section 151 approval requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.