Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
ITAT affirmed re-assessment notice for AY 2013-14 as valid under TOLA, finding no procedural objections by the assessee. On unexplained bank deposits, the tribunal determined a taxable profit margin of 8% rather than the assessee's proposed 3-7% range, lacking substantive evidence. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to separately compute business income and interest income, with TDS on interest to be brought to tax under income from other sources. The appeal was partly allowed, with the re-assessment proceedings upheld and a modified approach to taxing unexplained deposits implemented.
ITAT affirmed re-assessment notice for AY 2013-14 as valid under TOLA, finding no procedural objections by the assessee. On unexplained bank deposits, the tribunal determined a taxable profit margin of 8% rather than the assessee's proposed 3-7% range, lacking substantive evidence. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to separately compute business income and interest income, with TDS on interest to be brought to tax under income from other sources. The appeal was partly allowed, with the re-assessment proceedings upheld and a modified approach to taxing unexplained deposits implemented.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.