Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT affirmed re-assessment notice for AY 2013-14 as valid under TOLA, finding no procedural objections by the assessee. On unexplained bank deposits, the tribunal determined a taxable profit margin of 8% rather than the assessee's proposed 3-7% range, lacking substantive evidence. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to separately compute business income and interest income, with TDS on interest to be brought to tax under income from other sources. The appeal was partly allowed, with the re-assessment proceedings upheld and a modified approach to taxing unexplained deposits implemented.
ITAT affirmed re-assessment notice for AY 2013-14 as valid under TOLA, finding no procedural objections by the assessee. On unexplained bank deposits, the tribunal determined a taxable profit margin of 8% rather than the assessee's proposed 3-7% range, lacking substantive evidence. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to separately compute business income and interest income, with TDS on interest to be brought to tax under income from other sources. The appeal was partly allowed, with the re-assessment proceedings upheld and a modified approach to taxing unexplained deposits implemented.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.