Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT affirmed re-assessment notice for AY 2013-14 as valid under TOLA, finding no procedural objections by the assessee. On unexplained bank deposits, the tribunal determined a taxable profit margin of 8% rather than the assessee's proposed 3-7% range, lacking substantive evidence. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to separately compute business income and interest income, with TDS on interest to be brought to tax under income from other sources. The appeal was partly allowed, with the re-assessment proceedings upheld and a modified approach to taxing unexplained deposits implemented.
ITAT affirmed re-assessment notice for AY 2013-14 as valid under TOLA, finding no procedural objections by the assessee. On unexplained bank deposits, the tribunal determined a taxable profit margin of 8% rather than the assessee's proposed 3-7% range, lacking substantive evidence. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to separately compute business income and interest income, with TDS on interest to be brought to tax under income from other sources. The appeal was partly allowed, with the re-assessment proceedings upheld and a modified approach to taxing unexplained deposits implemented.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.