Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
681 to 700 of 95999 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC determined the legality of service under Section 153 of the Customs Act, 1962, finding that registered post was the sole valid communication method prior to 2018. Speed post service was improper. The court quashed orders by the Additional Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals), holding the appeal was timely filed on 07.11.2017. A writ of certiorari was issued, directing the authority to adjudicate the appeal on merits. The writ petition was allowed, with interim orders discharged and interlocutory applications disposed of accordingly.
HC determined the legality of service under Section 153 of the Customs Act, 1962, finding that registered post was the sole valid communication method prior to 2018. Speed post service was improper. The court quashed orders by the Additional Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals), holding the appeal was timely filed on 07.11.2017. A writ of certiorari was issued, directing the authority to adjudicate the appeal on merits. The writ petition was allowed, with interim orders discharged and interlocutory applications disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.