Specified income tax exemption for pollution control body remains conditional on non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return filin...
Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
Market value for captive electricity consumption follows industrial consumer tariffs, supporting profit computation for the power generation deduction...
CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that for the period prior to 01.04.2011, no reversal of CENVAT Credit was required for input services used partially in trading activities. The Appellant had already voluntarily reversed Rs. 22,534/- with interest for trading-related credits. The tribunal found the department failed to establish credit inadmissibility, and thus set aside the original order denying CENVAT Credit, interest, and penalty. The decision affirmed the Appellant's right to claim input service credits across manufacturing and trading operations during the specified period.
CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that for the period prior to 01.04.2011, no reversal of CENVAT Credit was required for input services used partially in trading activities. The Appellant had already voluntarily reversed Rs. 22,534/- with interest for trading-related credits. The tribunal found the department failed to establish credit inadmissibility, and thus set aside the original order denying CENVAT Credit, interest, and penalty. The decision affirmed the Appellant's right to claim input service credits across manufacturing and trading operations during the specified period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
