Contractual tolerance requires consideration; breach recoveries, qualifying public infrastructure services and road works escape service tax liability...
Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that for the period prior to 01.04.2011, no reversal of CENVAT Credit was required for input services used partially in trading activities. The Appellant had already voluntarily reversed Rs. 22,534/- with interest for trading-related credits. The tribunal found the department failed to establish credit inadmissibility, and thus set aside the original order denying CENVAT Credit, interest, and penalty. The decision affirmed the Appellant's right to claim input service credits across manufacturing and trading operations during the specified period.
CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that for the period prior to 01.04.2011, no reversal of CENVAT Credit was required for input services used partially in trading activities. The Appellant had already voluntarily reversed Rs. 22,534/- with interest for trading-related credits. The tribunal found the department failed to establish credit inadmissibility, and thus set aside the original order denying CENVAT Credit, interest, and penalty. The decision affirmed the Appellant's right to claim input service credits across manufacturing and trading operations during the specified period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
