Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Independent professional certification requires pleaded knowledge or complicity for criminal liability; untimely complaints remain barred by limitatio...
CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that for the period prior to 01.04.2011, no reversal of CENVAT Credit was required for input services used partially in trading activities. The Appellant had already voluntarily reversed Rs. 22,534/- with interest for trading-related credits. The tribunal found the department failed to establish credit inadmissibility, and thus set aside the original order denying CENVAT Credit, interest, and penalty. The decision affirmed the Appellant's right to claim input service credits across manufacturing and trading operations during the specified period.
CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that for the period prior to 01.04.2011, no reversal of CENVAT Credit was required for input services used partially in trading activities. The Appellant had already voluntarily reversed Rs. 22,534/- with interest for trading-related credits. The tribunal found the department failed to establish credit inadmissibility, and thus set aside the original order denying CENVAT Credit, interest, and penalty. The decision affirmed the Appellant's right to claim input service credits across manufacturing and trading operations during the specified period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
